CONSENSUS AUDITORY-PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION OF VOICE CAPE-V PDF

Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V) The following parameters of voice quality will be rated upon completion of the following tasks. J Voice. Jan pii: S(17) doi: Validity of the Turkish Version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V). 25 Aug Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice ( CAPE-V). Zraick RI(1), Kempster GB, Connor NP, Thibeault S.

Author: Zulkisida Shazragore
Country: Albania
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Health and Food
Published (Last): 2 February 2007
Pages: 313
PDF File Size: 1.61 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.53 Mb
ISBN: 334-6-78817-231-4
Downloads: 59186
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shajinn

Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract.

National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. However, remote access to EBSCO’s databases from non-subscribing institutions is not allowed if the purpose of the use is for commercial gain through cost xuditory-perceptual or avoidance for a non-subscribing institution. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality. Voice Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester.

No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Second, we compared our raters’ judgments of overall severity to a priori consensus judgments of severity for the 59 voices.

Generate a file for use with external citation management software.

METHOD Prospective observational study of voice quality ratings of randomized and blinded voice samples was performed. Copyright of American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v of American Speech-Language-Hearing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission.

Related Articles  SERVER CREATEOBJECT PERSITS PDF

Showing of 9 extracted citations.

Establishing validity of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).

A Training and Reliability Study. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners’ judgments of dysphonic voice. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation.

This abstract may be abridged. Psycho-acoustic auditory-perceptyal of voice.

Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: This study examined the reliability and the empirical validity of the CAPE-V when used by experienced voice clinicians judging normal and consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v voices.

Perceptual judgment of hypernasality and audible nasal emission in cleft palate speakers Kerri Downing The overall severity parameter had the highest intrarater and inter-reliability values for all the participants. Add to My Bibliography. Does the presence or location of graphic markers affect untrained listeners’ ratings of severity of dysphonia?

Similar Papers Loading similar papers…. There was no difference found between the organic and functional voice disorders in terms of the CAPE-V scores.

For the consehsus application of this study, it would be important to investigate whether consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v measures correlate with the auditory-perceptual judgments of dysphonia severity collected by a Turkish version of the CAPE-V. Remote access to EBSCO’s databases is permitted to patrons of subscribing institutions accessing from remote locations for personal, non-commercial use.

Related Articles  GAMMAGRAFIA INDUSTRIAL PDF

The Turkish version of CAPE-V lf been proven to be a reliable and valid instrument to use in the auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice.

Perception of dysphonic voice quality by naive listeners. Published by Elsevier Inc. Didn’t get the message? Assessment practices of Irish speech and language therapists in the evaluation of voice disorders. Consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice cape-v review our privacy policy.

The different types of voice disorders, classified as organic and functional disorders, were compared in terms of their CAPE-V uaditory-perceptual. Presentations referencing similar topics.

Establishing validity of the consensus auditory-perceptual evaluation of voice (CAPE-V)

American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. The Americleft Speech Project: Listener experience and perception of voice quality. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.

Sources of listener disagreement in voice quality assessment. For all four raters, the differences in the six CAPE-V parameters between the study and the control groups were found to conaensus statistically significant.